[ShovelThemOut]

For the life of me, I don’t know WHY people were counting out PA for Romney. When I go to realclearpolitics and look at the PA polls, they have Zero up by 4 points and don’t have any link to the poll internals. When there is no link to the internals, you can bet they are over-sampling Dims. Then I thought surely the Romney campaign has their own PROPER internal polls of PA.

This is exactly what I believe is going on. The lame-stream polls showing Zero ahead are over-sampling Dims. I just wish Team Romney would put out more hints about their internal polls.

When I look at Romney and Zero, it is not Romney who looks desperate to me.

[DallasBiff]

When I look at Romney and Zero, it is not Romney who looks desperate to me.

I actually watched the Obama/Letterman lovefest last night and it was Obama who seemed to be on the defensive, with "uh" being every other word.

As for Letterman he made Monica Lewinsky look like Mother Theresa, with his fawning eyes towards Obama.

[MMaschin]

The reason is that Obama's lead nationally in 2008 was around 7.6%, but in PA he won by 10.3%.

So, they are thinking that since he won PA by almost 3% more than the national average, then Romney would need to beat Obama by more than 3% nationally to be competitive in PA. And since they are thinking this is looking like a very close election nationally, they are discounting the possibility of Romney winning PA.

I think this is bunk, andRomney IS beating Obama well enough to win PA!