Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tatown
It's nice to see it back to even again. But here is what I don't get:

"When “leaners” are included, it’s Obama 48% and Romney 47%. Leaners are those who are initially uncommitted to the two leading candidates but lean towards one of them when asked a follow-up question."

This seems to fly in the face of the basic idea that the UNDECIDEDS ALWAYS BREAK FOR THE CHALLENGER. And note that Raz has pretty consistently shown just the opposite. Obama seems to always sweep up the majority of the "leaners".

What's up with that?

8 posted on 09/22/2012 6:41:44 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

My reply from another thread, about a rigged pole;

“I got an interesting call yesterday! Rigged! A recording, asking who I was going to vote for. From DC. It required simple “Yes/No” answers.
“First question, answer yes or no; Do you intend to vote for Romney?”
I attempted to answer “Yes,” but the space left for the answer was suddenly filled with a series of beeps, like someone dialing the phone. When the beeps stopped, one word, “Obama?” Betcha my “Yes” during the beeps was recorded for Obama. At the very least, there was no way you could vote for Romney!”


20 posted on 09/22/2012 7:01:33 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson