Romney says his campaign doesn’t need a ‘turnaround’

Yahoo News—The Ticket ^ | September 23, 2012 | Holly Bailey

[Olog-hai]

Mitt Romney insisted his campaign is not in need of a "turnaround" in spite of polls showing President Barack Obama expanding his lead in battleground states.

In an interview with CBS's "60 Minutes," the Republican presidential nominee rejected criticism from conservative pundits who have called his campaign incompetent.

"It doesn't need a turnaround," Romney insisted, pointing to national polls that have him "tied" with Obama. "I've got a very effective campaign. It's doing a very good job." …

[xzins]

Ryan has been relatively silent while he’s been getting schooled in the “proper” answers.

Personally, I thought Clinton’s DADT was a terrible policy. The original said, “no homosexuals.” That’s the correct policy. But that’s not what Ryan appears to be recommending.

The loyalty of a homosexual is to other homosexuals in the same way the affinity of an idolater is to other idolaters. Those who believe in the unnatural are much more comfortable around other unnaturals.

What does this mean? It means the eventual takeover of the military by the “pink” movement, in the same way the democratic party was taken over, and the republican taken over, and denominations taken over.

The unnaturals support one another before they support any flag any system. And being given to rationalizing unnatural things, they can rationalize anything, to include betrayal.

This is how one takes over the military from the inside, how one imposes slavery upon a formerly free people.

[jazusamo]

Well said by you both.

Thanks for the pings.

[P-Marlowe]

I have always wondered why a vice presidential nominee feels compelled to mimic the policies of the presidential nominee when, in fact, they already have the nomination and they should feel free to campaign on their own ideas and not those of the presidential nominee.

When we consider a presidential ticket, do we only need to consider the views and policies of the presidential nominee without regard to how the vice presidential nominee feels? Why does the vice presidential nominee need to be muzzled in a campaign where he is already been given the nomination?

Ryan was a solid social conservative before he got the nomination, and now he’s a solid RINO on social policies. What the hell happened to him?

[xzins]

Apparently, he and Faust have a lot in common.

[Semper Fi Mom]

Thanks for the post!!

[Semper Fi Mom]

Thanks for the ping!!

[Dick Vomer]

OF COURSE DADT is never getting repealed. Just like Obamacare isn’t. We can’t even stop the gestapo TSA from doing “freeze” exercises and expanding their “powers” to highways, bus stops and rail.

This is all kabuki theatre and the REAL tell is the “pension bailout” for the states that spent being placed on the backs of frugal states like Texas. We are SCREWED. Bank on it.