[ansel12]

Surely you can understand the difference between personal attacks on freepers, and discussing public figures in the news and politics and history, etc?

Your candidate is not the same as a freeper, for one thing, he would have been banned as a troll, Mitt Romney could never be a freeper.

His support for the homosexual agenda alone, would prevent that.

[mkjessup]

Surely you can understand the difference between personal attacks on freepers, and discussing public figures in the news and politics and history, etc?

First of all, in your little world of conservative ideological perfection, ANY post which does not agree with you and takes issue with you, constitutes a 'personal attack'. Let's make that clear.

Your candidate is not the same as a freeper

So who is YOUR candidate Ansel? In the interest of full disclosure, tell us who YOU support, ok?

for one thing, he [Romney] would have been banned as a troll, Mitt Romney could never be a freeper.

If Romney was a FReeper, you would have been riding the lightning long ago for your persistent and never ending attacks on him.

Lucky you.

Here's a question for you: Would Ronald Reagan be supporting the GOP ticket this year, or would he sit it out, citing his superior conservative credentials like you do?

[cynwoody]

His support for the homosexual agenda alone, would prevent that.

And your candidate is any better?

Because that's what it comes down to. If you are against Mitt, you are for Obama! (With apologies to W for the rhetorical device)