Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kearnyirish2

I doubt that McCain won have won in 2008 under any circumstance. A third-term in the presidency for any party is a historic rarity - Bush 41 was the first time (other than FDR) since 1928.

That said, the magnitude of McCain’s loss would have been considerably smaller without the financial meltdown - ironically caused by the RATS from the beginning. And several senate races would have been salvaged without the McCain undertow.

Once the meltdown occurred, the voters saw McCain as a mumbling, bumbling old man who couldn’t string 3 coherent sentences together and knew nothing about the economy.


18 posted on 09/25/2012 7:03:08 PM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: mwl8787

“Once the meltdown occurred, the voters saw McCain as a mumbling, bumbling old man who couldn’t string 3 coherent sentences together and knew nothing about the economy.”

That is my point; until then much fewer people would have risked a socialist with a Muslim name (Obama was trailing consistently up until the meltdown). The same forces that drove desperate people to elect the unqualified unknown, now that things have gotten even worse, should suffice to depose him.


22 posted on 09/25/2012 7:12:21 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson