Posted on 09/27/2012 12:41:46 PM PDT by Lorianne
“You assume too much.
I am not offended in the least by Akin’s comment, I am vindicated!
The guy is an blithering idiot and I was right about him from the start. (Wish I weren’t and we could pick up a seat in the Senate ... but oh well).”
So you were right about him from the start! What gives you all this wonderful insight.
Do we all understand now why McCaskill gave millions to Akin's primary campaign?
I should have posted:
Do we all understand now why McCaskill spent millions supporting Akin's primary campaign?
And I hope we do all now understand why.
I don't know that I've "bashed" Akin, much less hard or consistently - and I am pro-life, and pro-ladylikeness (at least in women). What I dislike is his statements that do nothing to help him win: about the biology of pregnancy after rape, and whether McCaskill is "ladylike."
I disagree - it's clear to me that in the context of a political campaign it's at least as important to ask if it needed to be said, was relevant, and helps him win.
You don’t speak for me.
I want him to win so we get a majority in the Senate.
Then I want him to step down so that another conservative who is not a blithering idiot can take his place.
I don’t want to spend the next 6 years having to explain that yes, I’m conservative and yes I’m pro-Life but I don’t agree with the moronic comments of blithering idiot Akin (and I know he’s going to continune making stupid irrelevant comments). I don’t want the pro-Life cause to be derailed everytime this blithering idiot opens his mouth.
Clear enough?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.