Image from article online.
Image from article online.
Baloney
Good job. Start a fight for no reason. Good boy.
One of the problems with the “fossil record” is the assumption of what it actually is.
If you assume that it corresponds to long periods of time, you’ll interpret it one way,
and if you assume “billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth” by a catastropic event, over a period of just a few years,
you’ll interpret it another way.
Its so much more in vogue to deny creatonism — this way we do not have to bother ourselves by contemplating the existence of a Being greater than us.
This also means that we do not have to believe in an absolute truth and can accept any erroneous and fanciful theory and concentrate more on me, me, me.
I’ve yet to see a scientific argument against evolution that didn’t really boil down to “we don’t yet know.” Then again, I’ve yet to see an evolutionist who could bring himself to admit that there’s a lot we don’t yet know. In exchange after exchange, debate after debate, the evolutionists invariably fall back to ad hominid (hee hee) attacks and appeals to authority. They would be more rhetorically effective if they would occasionally admit they don’t know everything. Not holding my breath on that.
Like in quantum mechanics, there must be distinct states that life can attain, called species. There are no transitional states.
I believe in the Prometheus (movie) theory of creation- that a superior HUMAN life created the precursors of all life up until humanity was reconstituted. Once you have humans, you will very soon have the knowledge of life and therefore any sort of evolution will be controlled by humans. God was truly created in our image and we will soon know this. Very soon we will be in complete control over the life forms on this planet, so it would be impossible for others to emerge dominant.
Evolution Of Higher, More Complex Life Forms Has Not Been Observed To Be Happening Now
Our chickens peck at paint dots. They peck and peck and peck. They believe the dots are food. They are not rational, they just believe. It’s fun to watch them for a few moments, then it just gets sad. Buy hey, they are for laying eggs, not debating finer points of logic.
“No truly new species has ever been produced, let alone a new basic kind.”
Then one must use a different definition of a what constitutes a “species”, say a a slight variation in color or mating habits. There, now new “species” can be found almost at will.
Henry M. Morris has a BS degree in civil engineering, and MS/Ph.D degrees in hydraulic enginnering. He has no formal degree or training in biology, palentology, or any other science that studies the theory of evolution. His opinions are not based upon science, but upon faith.
bookmark
Creationist Ping!
I have known colleagues in major universities of high repute as research centers, fully accredited professors, peer review and published, that would not accept the evolutionary model simply on the basis of utter improbability. Of course they did not publicize their unacceptable doubts, since the gateway to tenure in all such educational institutions is controlled by evolutionists.
I would find most interesting an explanation as to the process that produced the first double helix, so essential to so many of the signature processes of the phenomenon called “life.”
Cherry-picked facts and quotes, strung together with logical fallacies is not “science”.
bfl
Cite this article: Morris, H. M. 2012. The Scientific Case Against Evolution. Acts & Facts. 41 (10): 4-5.
If Henry Morris died in 2006, when was this article written? The latest reference is 2000. Telling people to cite this article as being written in 2012 is dishonest.