I'm saying I served aboard several aircraft carriers. Life was rude enough without purposeful complications based on the social justice criteria of feminazis. The purpose of our military is to defend our nation. It does not exist to serve as a never ending petri-dish for leftist experimentation.
xr is right. The general did not recently begin to abuse subordinates. He should have been stomped on long ago.
I'm saying I served aboard several aircraft carriers. Life was rude enough without purposeful complications based on the social justice criteria of feminazis. The purpose of our military is to defend our nation. It does not exist to serve as a never ending petri-dish for leftist experimentation. So if I'm understanding you correctly, it's not fair to expect men to follow the rules and regulations laid out by the UCMJ where females are involved? So by putting them in a position where women are around, then if they violate those regulations then it's not their fault it's the womans? So should we court martial the women involved as well? Or just them?