Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/06/2012 3:28:37 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GiovannaNicoletta

?


2 posted on 10/06/2012 3:31:46 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1355 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

Interesting article. It made me really get a feeling for what it must be like for the “educated and intelligent” citizens of Iran or other dictatorial mideast hellholes. We could be in the same boat if we don’t stop it.


3 posted on 10/06/2012 3:40:27 PM PDT by EggsAckley ("There's an Ethiopian in the fuel supply!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

I don’t buy it.


4 posted on 10/06/2012 3:47:38 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
The article actually makes very little sense. If the Iranian regime was using hard currency to subsidize specific sectors, the middle class and merchant class could easily invest in non-perishable / semi-perishable commodities being subsidized in order to diminish the inflationary impact, or even buy dollars or other hard currency directly.

Even if they cannot do that because of political oppression, the price in rials of their existing property is appreciating dramatically in rial (but not real) terms. Eventually, they will either be able to sell that property for hard currency or many more rials than they paid for it.

The fact that the government effectively props up its soft currency in specific sectors doesn't stop wealthier people from buying in those sectors. It also doesn't stop entrepreneurs from buying in those sectors and then turning around and selling in inflated soft currency at higher prices when the inevitable shortages occur.

The author is advancing a claim that money -- even the "internal" money of an autarky can have different values in different parts of an economy. This is silly because no oil exporting country in the Middle East can possibly be an autarky. But it's even sillier for the reasons just given: rials can buy anything in Iran, and that means that once the subsidized goods enter the market, they are traded implicitly or explicitly against rials, and their price becomes hyper-inflated as well.

A far more likely explanation for the regime's distress is 1) increased production by the Saudis and Iraqis is cutting into the Iranians' margins and 2) they've used up most of their reserves of hard currency that they've been using to buffer the rial from hyperinflation since the sanctions began. If the latter, we will know in a matter of days or weeks.

10 posted on 10/06/2012 4:42:59 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And that's the end of our show! Doink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

Yep. Good find. Other countries in Asia, including China and India, will buy all of the oil that Iran can produce. Other countries, yet, continue to buy other products (e.g. pistachios, rugs,...), no doubt. What we’ve been seeing to the contrary is free traitor propaganda. They’re afraid of Iranian oil being subtracted from the world supply and of angering other Islamist nations (other trade, product prices, etc.).


11 posted on 10/06/2012 4:43:48 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GiovannaNicoletta; silverleaf

read later


12 posted on 10/06/2012 5:49:06 PM PDT by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson