[thecodont]

2. The fix is already in. Obama has a computer czar who could have spent the last 4 years figuring out how to have the computer tally more votes for Obama than his challenger regardless of the actual vote count.

People hear on the news about the "drop in unemployment" and look to the right of them and see an unemployed neighbor, to the left of them and see another, in front of them and see food stamps, and there's a reality check.

Kerry/Edwards lost in 2004 and the outcry on the left was that the "Republican-controlled computerized voting" was the culprit. You believe the Dems will come up with a real version of electronic cheating?

People go to the polls and vote for R&R, they compare notes with as many in their network and neighborhood as they can, and see... the MSM news announcing BO as the winner in spite of what actually happened at the polling places. There's another reality check. It won't be a nice one.

[null and void]

It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. ~ Joseph Stalin

[null and void]

You believe the Dems will come up with a real version of electronic cheating?

Long bitter experience has taught me that evil people will INVARIABLY accuse others of committing whatever crime they themselves are engaged in.