I would think it is self evident that when the owner of the site chooses to throw his support behind someone that it is pretty stupid to argue the contrary position ad nausem on his site.
Many of us railed the PDS brigade for doing exactly that. It would therefore be the height of hypocrisy, not to mention arrogant, to act like them.
In short, Jim SHOULDN’T have to ask squat. Common decency says you don’t crap in a man’s house.
"what happens to those who now buck the management and continue to work to defeat Romney? Those that even now are still posting threads to tear down the GOP nominee?" - icwhatudo, /focus/f-news/2920626/posts?page=99#99
"They’re all going to have to wrestle their own way through it and come to their own decisions. It’s not as easy as it looks." - Jim Robinson, /focus/f-news/2920626/posts?page=124#124
I would think it is self evident that when the owner of the site chooses to throw his support behind someone that it is pretty stupid to argue the contrary position ad nausem on his site.
Jim seems to have explicitly left the door open for at least respectful disagreement.
Many of us railed the PDS brigade for doing exactly that. It would therefore be the height of hypocrisy, not to mention arrogant, to act like them.
What's "PDS"?
In short, Jim SHOULDN’T have to ask squat. Common decency says you don’t crap in a man’s house.
It's far from clear that Jim considers, or that we should consider, respectful disagreement with a position Jim apparently reached and holds only with the utmost reluctance to be "crap."