[penelopesire]

Thanks for the link. Just scanning it caught this little ditty:

OPERATOR:  The next question is from the line of Shaun Waterman, Washington Times.  Please go ahead.

 

MODERATOR:  Shaun?  Let’s go to the next question, and maybe Shaun can go next.  Maybe he’s not off mute.”

 
So they purposely disconnected Washington Times reporter too. The whole thing reads like......’ Ok media troops...let’s get our stories straight and this is what you are to report’

Just pathetic! This is impeachment stuff yet you would never know it reading the worthless American media. They made sure too that no media that might dare report the truth could even be there or ask a question.

[thouworm]

There's hope that this has legs; this has legs...even in the LSM.

Pen: Call me naive, but This has legs right up to the election:

U.S. official says superiors worked against effort to boost Benghazi security [CNN ...and carries Nordstrom's "Taliban" remark]

Obama’s Libya statements become ludicrous [WaPo]

PS: Also, I have been keywording those articles that present an ever-evolving timeline with the keyword "benghazitimeline." These deal, so far, with what official said what when...to be compared with what facts were already known at the time.

I was told Bret Baier presented a withering timeline on his Fox program. I have taped, but not watched yet.

[Red_Devil 232]

If you scroll down you will find that they finally reconnect with Shaun and he does get to ask his question.