[X-spurt]

Come on admit it, you paulnutz are happy with nobama and have no problems with “the end justifies the means” philosophy... With the insane hope he will eventually destroy America and what rises from the ashes is Paulnutland where anything goes and the dope's easy and cheap.

[OneWingedShark]

Come on admit it, you paulnutz are happy with nobama and have no problems with “the end justifies the means” philosophy... With the insane hope he will eventually destroy America and what rises from the ashes is Paulnutland where anything goes and the dope's easy and cheap.

There's so much wrong with that statement it's hard to know where to begin:
First, I didn't say anything about supporting Ron Paul.
Second, the "ends justify the means" is far more of the spirit of the War on Drugs [WOD] than those who deny that policy's legitimacy.
(

• The fourth amendment is routinely violated for the WOD, to the point where the most unreasonable of searches, the no-knock raid, are commonplace and where warrants which are supposed to "particularly describe the person or items to be seized" ramble on describing things in such sweeping terms as to render the clause as pointless. [See warrants which describe computer-related crimes: they describe EVERYTHING that's remotely connected to the computer.]
• The fifth is rendered futile because the WOD has allowed and legitimized the practice of "arresting" property.
• The sixth is rendered impotent because the government claiming "drugs" instantly taints the jury and they very often do not consider the legitimacy of the law the accused is said to have violated. Additionally, there are WOD-related crimes that are based wholly on psychic-powers discerning intent, rather than the actual actions where-which the law is supposed to be concerned.
• The eighth is trashed because of ridiculous sentence-lengths for drug-related crimes.
• The ninth is violated in rulings like Raich in that the government claims that growing your own product, of an item that has no [legal] market impacts the market-that-would-exist-if-it-were-legal and therefore the [federal] government can regulate it.
• The tenth is repudiated in that the State's are powerless to determine whether or not they wish to allow such drugs.
• Additionally, the mental-gymnastics [aka Troll-logic] required to legitimize the WOD undermines the whole of the Judiciary. (See Raich.)

)
Third, I think that Romney will not do anything good for America. Period. (Given that Obama's out-and-out corruption is at least waking people to the need to guard liberty, he may actually be better in the long run than electing Romney who, being a statist, will not reduce the power of the federal government but may cause complacency to return due to people believing that changing President is "doing something" with respect to liberty. [That's not the way it works, you are the front-line guardian of Liberty.])
Let me put that into a diagram:

OBAMA        ROMNEY
Elected      Elected
    |          |
    |          |
    |          |
 RADICAL      FABIAN
 SOCIALIST    SOCIALIST
      \       /
       \     /
        \   /
         \ /
          |
          |
      IMPLEMENTS
      SOCIALISM