http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=commission-leadership
Yeah, the Commission is non-partisan. Sure it is.
When Obama speaks ex cathedra, it is more than a simple lie. It becomes infallible doctrine that must be adopted by the entire party in order to preserve the fiction that Barack Obama is intelligent, truthful, and competent to be President.
An example of this type of statement is when he said in an early Democrat Primary debate in 2008 that he would talk directly with Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and that by doing so, he could defuse Irans nuclear and terror export programs. Instead of walking this statement back the next day, he enshrined this error as a cornerstone of his campaign and it became the fundamental weakness of his Presidential foreign policy.
Another example of this is his oft repeated promise that "If you like your doctor, you can keep him!" This was clearly and demonstrably not true under Obamacare, and the inability of the patient to continue current arrangements remains one of the primary reasons people resist the implementation of the rule. But Obama made this statement so absolutely and so emphatically that every Democrat was required to pretend it was true.
And now we come to his statement in last night's debate, full of bluster and high dungeon, that the suggestion that anybody in his team, whether the Secretary of State, our U.N. Ambassador, or anybody else, would play politics or mislead when we've lost four of our own, is offensive, and not what he does as President or Commander in Chief. This statement now becomes the new Reality According to Barack Obama. Unfortunately for the President, it is easily contradicted by any of a thousand easily verifiable sources. Defending this statement is going to lead to endless contradiction and will only make the President look like even more of a manipulative liar.
Candy threw her blubbery mass in front of dear leader as a shield.
Madam Chairman I have a point of order. The chairman is debating.
Crowley failed with that intrusion.
She was gonna cover for Barry by turning the pre-election thinking--just as she did--by an attempt to spread the President's general use of the word "terror" into his description on Day Two of the debacle instead of day Fifteen and after the lie of the video. It was intended really to throw the election back to Barry! She was prepared to be as forceful as she turned out to be at that moment, but she didn't expect the pushback from (God and) Romney.
She had (Satan's) visions of making the entire Democrat Party beHOLDEN to her and watching her career take a meteoric rise in a second Obama term!
HF
Look at it this way — Ms. Fat Fly On The Wall’s mistake is developing as the lead news cycle story out of the debate — not good for Bobo ...
Here is what Romney should have said. I penned this in two minutes off the top of my head.
“Mr. President - spare me your lecture. Your record speaks for itself. You have failed to attend 3/4 of your intel briefings opting for golf and fundraising instead, your admn denied the Benghazi embassy the requested added security on at least 4 occasions, as the embassy was under attack you jetted off to a fundraiser in Las Vegas and a photo op on The View as well as a fundraiser w Jay Z. You proceeded to blame a non-existent youtube video at the UN and spent $74,000 of taxpayer money on ads in Arabic on pakistani TV to apologize for said video. The FBI was not on the scene for 3 weeks while CNN was able to secure the Diary of Ambassador Stevens the day after the attack. And now you hide behind Hillary Clinton who has said she will not be serving a second term and have the gaul to lecture us? Mr. President shame on you. Americans deserve better than the incompetent and faiiled and non-existent leadership you provide. That is going to change when I am elected President three weeks from now.”
Using the word “terrorism” in a speech is not the same as calling the attack terrorism. Crowley, in her zeal to defend her idol, Obama, gave up her role as referee, and attempted to trip Romney. When all of the instant analyses are long over and forgotten, Sycophant Crowley and her team of democrat bed wetters at CNN will end up the loosers in this debate.
Using the word “terrorism” in a speech is not the same as calling the attack terrorism. Crowley, in her zeal to defend her idol, Obama, gave up her role as referee, and attempted to trip Romney. When all of the instant analyses are long over and forgotten, Sycophant Crowley and her team of democrat bed wetters at CNN will end up the loosers in this debate.
Thanks Candy, but those of us with brains already knew you were full of it and yelling at our TV’s when you interrupted.
Are we supposed to care what Creepy Crawler says?
The left is completely ignoring Crowley’s backtracking. Shocker.
This lady should be fired! She is unprofessional. She did the worse job a a so called moderator. She lied!