Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: RummyChick
To: RummyChick
She’s simply another of N libo-bimbos.
Where N is almost an uncountably large number.
3 posted on
10/17/2012 5:25:09 PM PDT by
Da Coyote
To: RummyChick
Are they going to count “uh” in their word count?
To: RummyChick
The media is lying about Obama lying about his lying.
5 posted on
10/17/2012 5:29:09 PM PDT by
yarddog
To: RummyChick
6 posted on
10/17/2012 5:31:11 PM PDT by
Brandonmark
(2012: Our Hope IS Change!)
To: RummyChick
Say what you like, but Candy, by deciding she was a “fact checker” instead of a moderator really messed up. Her feeble attempt backfired and all the spin, lying and flimsy excuses are not going to exonerate her. Whatever little bit of credibility she may have had is gone. Her, Dan Rather and Olberman are cut from the same cloth. She really didn't have a lot to lose because she was nothing from the start.
7 posted on
10/17/2012 5:43:22 PM PDT by
Gertie
To: RummyChick
Pretty thin skinned in the face of real, fact-based criticism if they have to stoop to counting the words spoken by each person!
And the everlasting question that makes all of us beat our head against the nearest wall: “Why do the Republican candidates always agree to debates with liberal MSM moderators? Why?”
8 posted on
10/17/2012 5:45:59 PM PDT by
leapfrog0202
("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
To: RummyChick; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; LdSentinal; ...
Candy left a sour aftertaste on the American people.
9 posted on
10/17/2012 5:46:24 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(Muslims are a people of tolerance, life,and peace, and if you don't agree, they'll murder you)
To: RummyChick
Well that would work except for the fact that we all saw Candy being unfair to Mitt.
Sombody needs to let CNN’s briliant managing editor, Matt, know that when you watch TV you actually might notice what you are watching.
10 posted on
10/17/2012 5:48:05 PM PDT by
rod1
(CTLY)
To: RummyChick
"...Candy and her commission producers tried to keep it even but that Obama went on longer largely because he speaks more slowly. We're going to do a word count to see whether, as in Denver, Romney actually got more words in even if he talked for a shorter period of time."
Yes we should compensate for an inarticulate, ill prepared candidate who needs time to think of excuses for his miserable job performance to date. I assume that there are people out there who buy this rubbish but I sure hope they're not voting.
11 posted on
10/17/2012 5:52:57 PM PDT by
Timocrat
(Ingnorantia non excusat)
To: RummyChick
On why Obama got more time to speak, it should be noted that Candy and her commission producers tried to keep it even but that Obama went on longer largely because he speaks more slowly.
That is just too damned funny and desperate.
13 posted on
10/17/2012 5:54:08 PM PDT by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: RummyChick
CNN has a multi-million dollar appeal languishing in Obamas stacked NLRB (NLRB Case 05-CA-031828).
the administrative-law judge (an Obama donor) already ruled against CNN in 2009 .
Their appeal has since set before the 4 member NLRB board: 3 of them Obama appointees.
Of course Managing Editors don’t talk about these matters...
14 posted on
10/17/2012 5:54:32 PM PDT by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
To: RummyChick
We're going to do a word count to see whether, as in Denver, Romney actually got more words in even if he talked for a shorter period of time."Each "uuuhh" counts as its own word.
15 posted on
10/17/2012 5:56:41 PM PDT by
dead
(It ain't over until the phone lady sings.)
To: RummyChick
16 posted on
10/17/2012 6:08:25 PM PDT by
dead
(It ain't over until the phone lady sings.)
To: RummyChick
The solution for CNN is to come up with a prizes.
That's what biased failing newspapers have - prizes to replace the trust and respect of their readers that they used to compete for...now, it's 'prizes'. I don't believe anyone has ever received a Pulitzer for reporting on something that backs a conservative idea... so think of it as a prize for liberals.
Cable networks like CNN and MSNBC could do the same - award prizes to people like themselves - and like Candy - people known for being biased against Republicans. But not just biased - biased while telling the world they're objective. Authentic people don't qualify.
Anyhow CNN could hand out prizes until the 2,000 liberal elites in the country are their only audience.
Go for it CNN - if you believe Candy was fair, you're ready for the 'prize' scam...
17 posted on
10/17/2012 6:10:16 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(Candy picks ALL questions to ask from the hundreds submitted - Citizens are stage props.)
To: RummyChick
Actually its good that any sane American gets to witness this. I’ve been following the comments on Yahoo News for the last few weeks. Its been about a 3-1 advantage for Romney at least.
19 posted on
10/17/2012 6:26:14 PM PDT by
tflabo
(Truth or Tyranny)
To: RummyChick
I’m voting for Candy of the CNN Party!!! She was so Smart and presidential! Candy is dandy! Goooooo Candy!!! :)
To: RummyChick
Whitaker is as sleasy as Crowley. last night in trying to explain herself after the debate she conveniently mosquoted Obama as having referenced “These acts of terror...”, and now Whitacker tries to pretend that Obama’s claim at the debate was simply that he had referenced “an act or acts of terror”, rather than so identifying Benghazi.
Slimy.
To: RummyChick
Every time I hear Candy Crowley mentioned I immediately think of Miss Piggy or a predatory fat porn star.
24 posted on
10/17/2012 7:12:15 PM PDT by
RetiredTexasVet
(The law of unintended consequences is an unforgiving and vindictive b!tch!)
To: RummyChick
She failed in the most fundamental job of time-keeping.
25 posted on
10/17/2012 7:14:44 PM PDT by
Uri’el-2012
(Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson