The new sexual predators

Life Site News ^ | October 17, 2012 | Thaddeus Baklinski

[IbJensen]

What a dark and sinister world we live in. This world has been turned upside down. Our nation, in its immersion in Obamaism, has forgotten God and this is what we have become.

[Slambat]

“when female prostitutes engage with their clients, fatherless children can be born, growing up distinctly disadvantaged. “

Bill Clinton? disadvantaged?

[Tax-chick]

Why does the author start referring to women as “us” partway through the article? Isn’t he a man?

Not that I disagree with his (?) content, but it’s weird. The editor should have caught it.

[Popman]

This slide down the slippery slope started way before Obama....he just pours grease on the path to speed it up...

[DoughtyOne]

By far, men have always been the main buyers of sexual access to fertile females. Women virtually never pay for sexual access to either gender. Women and girls make up the overwhelming majority of prostitutes and escorts, and men overwhelmingly make up the clientele. This is true for every human culture, in every period in history. And it has everything to do with reproduction and the scarcity of the fertile female.

Horse pucky. It has everything to do with the reality that if a woman wants to fool around, she can always find a willing guy. If a guy wants to fool around, for many men they can seldom find a willing woman.

This is true in no small part because the sexual experience is different for men and women.

[jdsteel]

Absolutely right. The clients for sex with young attractive women are also in no way hoping for a baby from the transaction. The opposite is true. This entire article is, as you said, horse pucky.

[rbg81]

This is true in no small part because the sexual experience is different for men and women.

---

You are mostly correct. But the different sexual experience and proclivities of both genders are still rooted in the consequences of reproduction. If women are too fast & loose, they risk getting stuck with the spawn of undesirable and/or absent mates. Women also have a shorter “shelf life” then men, and need to be more choosey. In contrast, all a guy needs to safely spread his seed is a condom. Consequences are all too optional.

[blueunicorn6]

Actually written by Alana Newman.

[Gaffer]

I don’t know about anyone else here but on reading just the first few sentences of this, the “ewwwwww” factor in me was pretty high. Enough to just make me stop and say WTF?

Didn’t finish.

[DoughtyOne]

Not trying to be argumentative. I may be as off base as can be, and I hope I’m not being too indelicate here, but it’s still my perception that the act of penetrating or being penetrated result in a completely different mindset, no matter the protection.

I would venture that some women would agree and others would disagree with this.

[taterjay]

The article should have excluded the first part and been retitled ‘Mining the womb’. They want it all from girls and women. Contraception beginning in jr hi so ‘it’ is available at a young age for one type of customer and digging for eggs from others for another type of customer. God have mercy on us for accepting the sexual revolution.

[elcid1970]

Allow me to join you in the minefield of sexual differentiation:

Which is more powerful, the scabbard or the sword?

[AppyPappy]

Deadbeat guys with no ambition or money always seem to have the most potent sperm.

Stupid women with no interest in proper child-raising and a knack for finding the worst men always have the best eggs.

[Tax-chick]

I see - thanks.

[Tax-chick]

Good observations.

[Biggirl]

AMEN to what you have posted.

“Manatha, Come Lord Jesus, King of Kings, COME!”

[stuartcr]

Swords get rusty and fall apart if they aren’t in and out of a scabbard on a regular basis and scabbards get cobwebs if nothing is ever in them...

[jazzlite]

...”What a dark and sinister world we live in. This world has been turned upside down. Our nation, in its immersion in Obamaism, has forgotten God and this is what we have become”...

Mother Nature, created by God, will have some things to say about all this eventually. Isn't it interesting that the EPA and their ilk have ruined our society with their unending regulations but have little to say about this kind of usurpation of what nature intended? Not that I would recommend in 100,000 years that they should regulate human reproduction! I think I saw a headline this a.m. which indicated something about celebrity sperm donors..I just could not bring myself to read further. It is all very ghoulish.

[Tax-chick]

That’s disgusting.

[stuartcr]

I agree, totally uncalled for