To: SeekAndFind
I think a lot of people saw Romney for the first time in the first debate and realized he was viable, somebody they could vote for. Since then, all eyes have been on him, not Obama. They already know what they have in Obama. I don't think Obama stands to gain anything from here. Romney will expand the lead or not, it's up to him.
2 posted on
10/18/2012 9:03:09 AM PDT by
ryan71
To: SeekAndFind
The MSM knew that if Obama choked again it would be all over. They pulled all the stops to keep that from happening, and then ‘declared’ the debate a win for Obama. I don’t think it stopped the bleeding at this point.
To: SeekAndFind
"Combine those with the enthusiasm changes since 2008, and its not difficult to imagine that Romneys actual lead might be significantly wider than the +2 overall here." That there's the money quote. Is Rass using '08? Probably with a bit of a downward adjustment.
4 posted on
10/18/2012 9:11:01 AM PDT by
eureka!
(Bless Our Troops. D*mn the Left.)
To: SeekAndFind
Obama sounded good in the debates to the Kool-Aid drinkers.
Those who don’t know whats going on, but those interested in finding out are finding out after the debates that Obama was lying his way through. Those interested in the truth will vote for Romney.
6 posted on
10/18/2012 9:44:37 AM PDT by
Venturer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson