Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/18/2012 8:57:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind
I think a lot of people saw Romney for the first time in the first debate and realized he was viable, somebody they could vote for. Since then, all eyes have been on him, not Obama. They already know what they have in Obama. I don't think Obama stands to gain anything from here. Romney will expand the lead or not, it's up to him.
2 posted on 10/18/2012 9:03:09 AM PDT by ryan71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The MSM knew that if Obama choked again it would be all over. They pulled all the stops to keep that from happening, and then ‘declared’ the debate a win for Obama. I don’t think it stopped the bleeding at this point.


3 posted on 10/18/2012 9:09:11 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"Combine those with the enthusiasm changes since 2008, and it’s not difficult to imagine that Romney’s actual lead might be significantly wider than the +2 overall here."

That there's the money quote. Is Rass using '08? Probably with a bit of a downward adjustment.

4 posted on 10/18/2012 9:11:01 AM PDT by eureka! (Bless Our Troops. D*mn the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama sounded good in the debates to the Kool-Aid drinkers.

Those who don’t know whats going on, but those interested in finding out are finding out after the debates that Obama was lying his way through. Those interested in the truth will vote for Romney.


6 posted on 10/18/2012 9:44:37 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson