Posted on 10/18/2012 5:51:21 PM PDT by Olog-hai
Candy Crowley, the moderator of the presidential debate at Hofstra University on October 16, interfered in this U.S. presidential race in a way no one ever has before and—let’s hope—no one ever will again. Crowley loudly validated President Barack Obama’s version of reality—and contradicted Governor Mitt Romney’s recollection of actual reality—regarding what the president said in the Rose Garden about what happened in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2011.
During the debate President Obama said he called the murder of four Americans an act of terrorism. Romney said he didn’t. Crowley said he did. And Crowley told them they had to move along.
And then the debate did, in fact, move on. And the one opportunity during this debate that voters had to understand what Obama knew, when did he know it, and what did he call it, was lost. …
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishpress.com ...
whenever i bring this up before libs, they always say, “who do you want? someone from Fox?” well, why the hell not? for at least one of the four debates... damn!
Everyone has a bias. What we need is people of integrity that will not let their bias interfere with their performance.
From Fox at least, for one of them. Of course, with Ailes’ “course correction”, they might be left of center . . .
As Rush said, in normal media days, she would have already been fired.
Instead, CNN is applauding her performance, and will likely give her a raise.
Libs reward incompetence(Just look who the VP is)
Voter aren’t blind they saw Barry get shellacked regardless of the Jabba the Hutt trying to save him.
She used the Jedi mind trick on Romney but he snapped out of it.
Obama hid behind Candy’s skirt - did the same with Hillary and Rice. Pretty disgusting ...
2012, Not 2011 as the article states.
Sheesh.
“Who do you want?” Ask the libs !
We want normal fair and professional journalists !
One should ask them , who do they want and what do they want !
A WONDERFUL WORLD with no free speech and big medias wich are the servants of the power and owned by foreign money and interests....?
We need 1 impatial FOX and one right of center RUSH before we even begin to make it more fair
The moderator did more harm to Obama than good.
Romney pushed her buttons. she reacted as if on a string. She became the issue.
Tucker Carlson who worked over at CNN said he had been told by some who he still knows over there that they are cheering her and saying well done.
What a disgrace she and CNN and the NBC’s of this world are.
Biden and oabma have now bullied their way through this and obama’s wife clapping when Crowley came to the rescue , the questions picked, the show them the transscript Candy, the crowd picked from liberal NY.
It’s all been a farce and a set up by this corrupt media.
If we win this then this will be one of the greatest victorys in history
Exactly! I was just trying to think of a conservative in the media who lies like the ones on the left have. I cannot find one. They all seem to have the truth on their side.
Can anybody think of a right winger on our side who lies? We need him or her to moderate for the balance.
The an honest moderator from either FOX or EIB.
Integrity? That is a conservative trait, and therefore would be biased.
No, I want Rush Limbaugh, or John McLaughlin, or Michelle Malkin, or Pat Buchannan, or Michael Savage etc.
It would have been hilarious if Romney had looked her square in the eye and said, show us all this information you have chosen to share with us as a third debate participant.
So he has a woman come in and save him in the debate because he can’t stand up like a man ?
I saw a shellacking, anyway. Romney did grest! He must be, he’s not pulling funding from a bunch of states and his team isn’t talking “re-trenchment!”
What we need is people of integrity
************************
Greta.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.