I smell another set up. Over the last 4 years, how many terrorist have gone on tv to taunt America and NBC broadcasts it. They have recieved marching orders. I read yesterday (cant remember the site) that some military are questioning the draw down in security for an embassy in a dagerous country for an embassador with only 1 security guard on 9/11. They implied that the embassador was to be taken hostage without much resistance and, later, be exchanged for the blind sheik. I don’t know if that is true but it explains the cover up (if true). This site said that the 2 additional marines came to help and ruined everything. Is this guy taunting America so that Obama can exchange HIM for the blind sheik? I don’t know but this theory seems to be gaining ground. I just heard Judge Janine say that she has evidence that the 2 marines were there for a different reason and she can prove it. They were not expected to go save the Embassador. They began a fire fight and the rest is history.
From a previous post:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/benghazi-attack-was-botched-kidnapping-to-trade-blind-sheik/
Don’t make me put on my tinfoil hat!
Lets say there was the setup group for the kidnap/blind sheikh exchange. This guy was the head of the setup group. The prearranged cover story is the video. The setup Group gets mad when the Ambassador flees to the CIA safe house and they try to complete their part of the plan by burning him out unfortunately he dies of smoke inhalation. So this setup group leader trys to pick up the pieces by trying to get the Seals as ransom. This guy talks about directing traffic. Remember the Seal story about trying to be directed into a compound but smelled a trap. That was this guy trying to pick up the pieces of the hostage plan. My take this whole interview was a debrief code for the White House handlers working through Rice at the UN.