Still awaiting your reply.
You are still awaiting my reply to if Reagan signed abortion legislation as governor?
Are you reading the posts to you, where I describe the bill and it’s signing??
To: berdie
Your point is the context in which you use it, and then leave it hanging, it is obvious what your purpose is.
Reagan regretted it immediately when he saw what was being done with the bill that he signed in 1966, in his first months in office.
A bill that was to the right of Mitt’s current position on abortion, the bill said “health” but with strict interpretation needing a medical committee, within months doctors were being called before the boards for violating the law.
The pro-life movement was in it’s infancy then, Mitt Romney is no infant, Romney has always been a passionate and dedicated pro-choicer, along with his Planned Parenthood supporting wife.
211 posted on Sun Oct 21 2012 16:42:25 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by ansel12
To: berdie
The only purpose I had in answering your post at all is the phrases “always this” or “always that”. Let’s face it these people are politicians. They are not “always” anything. Please feel free to call me a cynic.
You are worse than a cynic, you are a liar, you just implied again that Reagan was once pro-abortion and switched, by using that “always this” or “always that” remark, Reagan was “always” pro-life, just as Romney was “always” pro-abortion, his own words verify that from 1963 to 2005.
In August Mitt rejected the republican pro-life platform.
By the way, to correct my previous post, it was 1967, not 1966 when Reagan signed the bill, Mitt had only been committed to being pro-abortion for 4 years, and the abortion wars were only just starting with RoeVwade coming up and decades of battles and elections to go, Mitt was on the pro-abortion side for all of those decades.
219 posted on Sun Oct 21 2012 17:08:44 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by ansel12