Now Wallace says that Romney was right about the Iraq Status or Forces agreement exchange, but you sure as hell wouldn’t have known that from the debate itself because Romney didn’t bother to vigorously defend the truth. AND THAT IS INDEFENSIBLE.
CNN also fact checked this in Romney’s favor as well...
All the pundits saying Romney did what he had to do by coming across as presidential. This only make sense if he has a commanding lead and is attempting to run the clock out. I think based on the polls he had to be aggressive and WIN THE DEBATE. He didn’t do that. He played not to lose rather than to win. Unforgivable.
Of course if the polls are wrong and he knows something I don’t then I could be wrong.
As the kenyan would say, you’re wrong.
Romney’s performance is totally defensible. Everything in this debate is predicated on the fact that Romney has never been POTUS. He can’t “win” issues when the American people don’t have the facts on things like Libya. For the moment, the kenyan can lie his ass off and nothing can be done about it.
Romney stuck to his game plan and of course it was all poll tested. Nothing is lost.