Replies

Didn't our Heavenly Father, through our Savior tell us...

" thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother."

How well we deserve this curse (~so shall the LORD bring upon you all evil things~) God has given us,
through the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT IN CHIEF, the FASCIST Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama II IS a Muslim.
His actions prove it.
To believe Barack Hussein Obama II, when he claims to be a Christian, is to trust Satan.
Muslims are well know for lying about their faith.

MUSLIMS are allowed to LIE and deceive NON MUSLIMS, if it benefits or protects ISLAM. Qur'an (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie. Qur'an (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves." Qur'an (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..." The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway. Qur'an (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must "hide his faith" among those who are not believers. Qur'an (2:225) - "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts" Qur'an (66:2) - "Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths" Qur'an (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means deceit. If Allah is deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21) Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be "compelled" to deceive others for a greater purpose. Posted by Atheist

For a better understanding of the issue, read HISTORY of Mohammed ( spelled variously; Mahomet, Muhammed, Mehmet, etc. ).#39;an (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must HISTORY of Mohammed ( spelled variously; Mahomet, Muhammed, Mehmet, etc. )

It is a two part problem.

First, State is being run by people that don't understand how the real world works. Libya right now is a lot like the era of the Barbary Pirates, minus the stability and order. When everybody else is pulling out of Benghazi because the neighborhood is becoming too dangerous, we decided to not only stay, but reduce our security force in an effort to "normalize" our consulate appearance. WTF.

The second issue was the President's inaction when the consulate came under attack. Had all the staff been able to escape the consulate then no immediate response would have been okay, still sending the wrong message. When we knew those people were not safe, especially when the annex came under attack, we should have done something. There are two reasons Obama chose to do nothing. The first was his misplaced respect of the sovereignty of a disorganized state. The second was he was afraid of the political fallout. 9 hour battle and no response. A complete failure.

"If the simplest answer tends to be the correct one...."

Maybe too easy. A friend of mine makes a pretty good arguement that the only reason to accept the political risk of openly supporting AQ would be for a big payoff.

That the ony reason to risk Americans finding out that they sat by and watched events unfold without reacting with any of the resources we had available would be for a big payoff.

What payoff would be worth that risk during an election year? All the accolades from media for repatriating a "kidnapped" ambassador.

Either the AQ detachment leader lost control of his cultists bloodlust, the AQ command couldnt resist sticking Allahs thumb in the Great Satans eye and went back on the deal, or the wrong moon baboons got into the embassy first.