Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SampleMan
As with any other government function, they screw it up. Doesn't make a difference to the Constitutional issue.

Besides, as with any other gun law, it affects only those inclined to obey the law. What the law does is make those that obey it (former convicts obviously not a threat) at risk while those that disobey it (violent offenders) get their weapons, regardless of your opinion, or of the law.

/johnny

37 posted on 10/23/2012 10:09:02 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper
Besides, as with any other gun law, it affects only those inclined to obey the law.

You are factually mistaken. The same logic applies to restraining orders. Can someone break the law? Well, of course they can, but doing so puts them in jeopardy. Many will avoid it or get caught before taking it to the next level. But, I would still outlaw murder, even if only 5% of people were ever caught.

Everyone here seems to have missed the constitutional issue of due process. People are not automatically losing their rights, felons are losing their rights AFTER due process.

42 posted on 10/23/2012 12:18:35 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson