Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL
The fact that Romney made a statement first is why they decided to blame the Youtube Video, to turn Mitt’s factual statement into a “gaffe”.

Seriously, I actually believe that.

Perhaps, you're correct. With this crowd, who knows?

However, your statement evokes a question I've been asking myself for a week-or-so.

How did the Obama Administration even come to be aware of the existence of the You Tube video -- "Innocence of Muslims"???!!!

To describe the video as "obscure" is an understatement. At the time the Administration rolled the video out as an excuse for the embassy protests in the Middle East, the video had recorded either 113 or 856 views, as I understand it. Further, it had been up on the web for at least two months.

How in hell did Obama and Hillary even know that the damned thing existed? And that it was provocative enough to conceivably inflame the Middle East? Who alerted them to its existence? And why?

And what inspired the Administration to employ this obscure piece of Pallywood propaganda as a semi-plausible excuse?

57 posted on 11/01/2012 4:47:14 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

That is one of the really big questions


72 posted on 11/01/2012 5:22:40 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: okie01
Top advisers receive top ears. Best guess ... valerie and huma.
74 posted on 11/01/2012 5:39:52 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson