Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/02/2012 4:43:50 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

The irony is that the storm ridden areas of the North east have people miserable. Miserable people vote for change. All that hard planning and effort Obama and his handlers have spent remaining visible, only work to remind people what they want change from. Obama.


2 posted on 11/02/2012 4:48:41 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The irony is the voters now underwater are... Obama voters!

Go figure.


3 posted on 11/02/2012 4:50:34 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

bttt new tagline too


4 posted on 11/02/2012 4:59:07 AM PDT by Principled (This is anot a leader who gets things done. This is a leader who explains why he didn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Even Sandy now has become Obama’s “Katrina”. Stick a fork, Obama is finished.


5 posted on 11/02/2012 5:02:59 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Amazing he has not yet blamed Sandy on GWB.


6 posted on 11/02/2012 5:10:11 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; Usagi_yo; goldstategop; Principled; Biggirl; originalbuckeye; Sir Francis Dashwood; ...
So as the estimable Hannity likes to say,...

Adjective

estimable (comparative more estimable, superlative most estimable)

1. Worthy of esteem; admirable.
Maybe for his hair and boyish good looks, maybe.

2. (archaic) Valuable.  
To his wife and kids, yes. To the intellectual debate? No.

3. Capable of being estimated.  
Ok. Ok. Number three is he!!

11 posted on 11/02/2012 5:25:35 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Nate Silver predicts that there is a 87.342% chance . . . “

Anybody who actually publishes a prediction to 5 significant figures has no real understanding of what numbers mean, and as a corollary, I suspect, has little idea how to actually use them.

So whether his data actually justify an 87% probability, or a roughly 90% probability, I’d guess they are, like his presentation of them, impressive looking, but largely a product of fundamental ignorance.


12 posted on 11/02/2012 5:57:47 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson