There was no surprise about the attack. There was no 'failure of intel.' The attack was predicted in precise detail a month before it occurred. The draw down of security had to be intentional.
CIA Sources: Obama ordered military not to help Ambassador Stevens
The failure to approve a rescue had to be intentional.
Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
Keeping the Counterterrorism Security Group (CSG) in the dark about the attack had to be intentional.
Tweeting apologies for the 'anti-Muhammed video' beginning early that morning, repeatedly blaming all the violence at all of our embassies on the 'video' and making an apology video to air in Pakistan had to be intentional.
Stevens presence in Benghazi on 9-11 had to be intentional.
The idea was to make it appear as if the terrorist are so in tune with the news they can pick up on a news story and plan an attack in a matter of minutes. In other words spontaneous.
That is the reason for the initial lie.
When the spontaneous lie fell through the only thing they could do was continue the lie so people would keep repeating there is no connection between the attack and the protest..
The lie is working. People are now under the impression there is no connection between the protest and the attack.
When you get to the truth, the terrorist attack was planned then the protest was planned as a cover, that pushes the planning for the attack back months.
You are 100% correct.
It is impossible to plan an attack against a particular person, on a particular day, at a particular location unless someone can guarantee they will be there on that particular day.
At a minimum, Hillary must be in the loop.
The fact the dems tied Zippo to the hip of Carter during the dem convention wasn't just a coincidence.
This was supposed to be set up for another Carter/Reagan “October Surprise” and blame it on the republicans.