Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

The 144 character “tweet” format is creating some confusion. The point is not that anyone could determine HOW someone had voted, but that an individual appeared in person at a polling station and was told that a ballot had already been cast in that person’s name.

In other words, one possible way this happened is that someone sent in a fraudulent absentee voter application in, say, Fred Smith’s name, voted it, and mailed it. Then, when the real Fred Smith turns up at his precinct and tries to vote, the poll workers see that Fred Smith has already returned an absentee ballot.


31 posted on 11/06/2012 11:37:47 AM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: absalom01

Well, it’s a near surety that if a fraudulent vote was cast, it was cast for 0bama.


37 posted on 11/06/2012 11:44:51 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson