[elkfersupper]

Anyone else having second thoughts on the 19th Amendment?

Count me among those. I first voiced this opinion during Clinton's first term.

We should definitely go back to male property owners having the right to vote and nobody else.

Of course, no individual has the "right" to vote in a presidential election.

[CatherineofAragon]

"We should definitely go back to male property owners having the right to vote and nobody else."

When it comes to vapid, moronic leftwing women (mostly those who are single), I definitely see your point. They're not women; they're walking vaginas. But there are lots of conservative women like me who don't vote based on feelings or hormones. I spent an hour and a half standing in line yesterday to vote for Mitt Romney, so while you're getting together your Constitutional convention to rescind the 19th Amendment, I suggest you draft an out for intelligent women, and refrain from lumping us all together.

[re_nortex]

We should definitely go back to male property owners having the right to vote and nobody else.

Freeper MrB expressed it quite correctly and very succinctly in post #11 from a May 2012 thread titled, Should we have some criteria to be a voter?:

Criteria: SKIN IN THE GAME

You must be a property owner and pay taxes, or serve in the military.

[2ndDivisionVet]

Perhaps propert owners and veterans of any sex would make more sense.