Win or lose, Obama was not and is not the president (affidavit on birth certificate forgery)

WND ^ | November 06, 2012 | Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

[Perseverando]

As I write, it is not yet clear who has won the presidential election. Win or lose, though, Mr Obama was not and is not the president. The Hawaiian long-form “birth certificate” he publicly endorsed and posted at the White House website last year as proof that he was born in the jurisdiction of the U.S. and is thus constitutionally eligible to be president is a forgery.

I can prove it.

I have been asked to prepare an affidavit in one of the 80 court cases U.S. citizens have filed in the hope of persuading someone – anyone – in office to lift a trembling, liver-spotted finger and do something about the forgery.

The affidavit, which I shall be swearing today, is posted here, with the written permission of the plaintiff’s attorney.

In very simple language, the affidavit explains how mathematicians apply probability theory to determine the probability that suspect documents are genuine.

The diligent, unpaid heroes who have been investigating the dodgy document for more than a year on behalf of the people of Maricopa County, Ariz., have found a long list of irregularities in Mr. Obama’s identification documents.

I have used the investigators’ list to draw up a schedule of probabilities – one for each individual irregularity. The probability that the “birth certificate” and other Obama identity documents are genuine is just 1 in 75 sextillion.

I have used this method to catch con men before. I used it to demonstrate that Al Gore’s sci-fi movie was political, not scientific. The High Court in London ordered Britain’s Education Department to issue 77 pages of corrective guidance before the movie could be shown to innocent pupils.

If a document is genuine, its few irregularities will

[Ray76]

“Obama” ballot access has been challenged by other candidates as well as by citizens. These challenges are in accordance with law.

Explain why “Obama” offers only verbal assertions regarding his identity and citizenship.

Explain why the document underlying the image posted at whitehouse.gov has not been presented to any court or election official.

[edge919]

It’s pretty cool when that “conspiracy nut” label applies to people like the first lady who insists Obama’s mama was single when he was born. Didn’t she see his forged birth certificate??