To: Renderofveils
LOL!
Exactly. His entire testimony will be nothing but, “I’m afraid I can’t comment on that particular issue. However, I did see ‘Skyfall’ over the weekend; anyone care to talk about that?”
You’re exactly right. He’s now a civilian, a former CIA employee, and anything he can say has to be cleared by the Agency first.
4 posted on
11/10/2012 11:36:03 AM PST by
AnAmericanAbroad
(It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
To: AnAmericanAbroad
Wouldn’t a grant of immunity cover that ?
6 posted on
11/10/2012 11:39:26 AM PST by
Eric in the Ozarks
(In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
To: AnAmericanAbroad
“You’re exactly right. He’s now a civilian, a former CIA employee, and anything he can say has to be cleared by the Agency first.”
As well as, “On the advice of my attorney I respectfully decline to answer that question on the grounds that it may incriminate me.”
10 posted on
11/10/2012 11:42:14 AM PST by
Stormdog
(A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
To: AnAmericanAbroad
Exactly. His entire testimony will be nothing but, “I’m afraid I can’t comment on that particular issue. However, I did see ‘Skyfall’ over the weekend; anyone care to talk about that?” You’re exactly right. He’s now a civilian, a former CIA employee, and anything he can say has to be cleared by the Agency first. Congressional Committee...secret session...grant of immunity = he testifies fully or he's held in contempt of Congress.
21 posted on
11/10/2012 12:06:23 PM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson