Specifics matter. That’s what the eligibility research that I’ve done for the last 3 years made abundantly clear to me. And now the “birthers” have been legally vindicated through HI state registrar Alvin Onaka’s confirmation that Obama’s HI BC is not legally valid and the WH image is a forgery.
The people who pooh-poohed that issue did so because they were unwilling to look at specifics and take them seriously. Seems like they’re the same people now (is deport also an anti-birther, as well as Conscience of a Conservative?) doing the same thing on this issue, unless they can come up with an explanation for the discrepancies in the numbers when their accounting method is used.
Mitt Romney REP 56125 45.41% Barack Obama DEM 66246 53.60% Thomas R Stevens OBJ 66 0.05% Gary Johnson LBT 517 0.42% Virgil H. Goode, Jr. CPF 31 0.03% Jill Stein GRE 110 0.09% Andre Barnett REF 11 0.01% Stewart Alexander SOC 10 0.01% Peta Lindsay PSL 9 0.01% Roseanne Barr PFP 145 0.12% Tom Hoefling AIP 11 0.01% Ross C. Anderson JPF 32 0.03% Write-in Votes 278 0.22% TOTAL Votes 123591 website # Total Votes 123591 Times Blank Voted 397 Times Over Voted 43 Total votes counted 124031 Times Counted 124031/175554 70.7 %
And now the “birthers” have been legally vindicated through HI state registrar Alvin Onaka’s confirmation that Obama’s HI BC is not legally valid and the WH image is a forgery.
Apparently, I have missed this... Or is this sarcasm?
I peruse FR everyday...
Please enlighten me.