Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/12/2012 2:57:33 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: autumnraine

This chick is target rich.. She just might blow the whole damned thing wide open.. WOW!


2 posted on 11/12/2012 3:05:08 PM PST by carlo3b (Less Government, more Fiber..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

Wow. How excellent is that, we now have a loose cannon trying to make a name for herself and throwing stuff out there for the world to see!

This is helping Obama by taking eyes off of that boring Benghazi, I mean they only anally raped and murdered an ambassador and then dragged his dying/dead corpse through the streets in glee...

A sordid sex tale of a loose, married slut and a disgraced general is more to the public’s liking - it also removes the limelight from Obama, which the left-wing press likes!

http://thedeathofamerica.org/images/petraeus.gif


3 posted on 11/12/2012 3:06:38 PM PST by Bon mots (Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine
She reminds me of John Kerry.

What's her next book?? "Lie down Sir...."

Sorry....I think this chick is nuts...would sell her soul....

4 posted on 11/12/2012 3:08:18 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

So it looks like both the LEAST important and MOST important thing about this is the “security breach” that would come with having someone you had been and maybe still were ‘intimately involved with’, come out and tell the public
what she knew about Benghazi. And I doubt ANYONE’s upcoming testimony will even touch on a couple of other rumored complications, like gun-running to Syria, and/or imprisoned Jihadists who the attackers were either trying to free or on whose behalf they were trying to take revenge..Either way, the Administration surrounded it with a carefully-constructed mess of contradictions, ambiguities, and imponderables to keep everyone as confused as they pretended to be in the run-up to the Election.
So, for all practical purposes, anything that’s revealed in upcoming testimony will have no effect on Obama’s Presidency,even if there’s a playable angle there that might get him impeached.


5 posted on 11/12/2012 3:10:28 PM PST by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

Paula Broadwell press conference with Gloria Allred in 3, 2, 1...


7 posted on 11/12/2012 3:19:08 PM PST by Apparatchik (If you find yourself in a confusing situation, simply laugh knowingly and walk away - Jim Ignatowski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

Very Important Post and Ping for later Evaluation!
Stinks like a Turd in the White House!


8 posted on 11/12/2012 3:22:17 PM PST by True Republican Patriot (May GOD SAVE OUR AMERICA from ALLAH and his Prophet, HUSSEIN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

Obama is blackmailing Gen Patraus.


10 posted on 11/12/2012 3:43:08 PM PST by kennyboy509 ( Ha! I kill me!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

Israel National News?


13 posted on 11/12/2012 3:51:55 PM PST by ZinGirl (kids in college....can't afford a tagline right now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine
Since nothing about this administration is as it seems and this particular tale is from the CIA where there are at least four turns out to every story, I am going to hazard a guess as to what may, just maybe the tale.
I have heard that the affair was over a while back and Broadwell and Petraeus remained friends. Now in the clip of Broadwell’s remarks at Denver University, she said that Petraeus as head of the CIA was not allowed to talk to the press. that started me thinking. What if Petraeus wanted to expose some of the facts that were being lied about and used Broadwell to tell the tale. Including that the CIA was holding prisoners at the compound. Think back to the “safe area” in the house as shown on TV. That sure looked more like a holding cell than a State Dept. safe area.
Maybe just maybe everything else is smoke and mirrors.
So far none of the stories about Benghazi has held water and most have really been ludicrous so this theory makes sense to me and would explain a lot.
15 posted on 11/12/2012 4:40:06 PM PST by Tupelo (Republican, a national party no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson