[cdcdawg]

The Obama Administration has a point. We do need to be “secure” in our later years, and there is a “social” interest in insuring that “security”, so I don’t see anything that could possibly go wrong. We could fund it via a payroll tax that could be split between the worker and the employer. That money would be completely separate from other government spending. Why haven’t they already tried this?!?!

Inability to detect sarcasm is a warning sign for dementia, FYI.

[SCalGal]

We do need to be “secure” in our later years, and there is a “social” interest in insuring that “security”, so I don’t see anything that could possibly go wrong.

And here I thought that the Death Panels were going to eliminate the need for Social Security.