So... 11 year olds are mature enough for sex, according to leftists, but need parents to insure them until they are 26?
“Brave New World” comes to mind...
A business owner I know who recently renewed his health plan was told that he also has the OPTION to add employee child coverage to AGE 30.
And you can be tootin-danged-sure that what is an OPTION today will become THE LAW tomorrow.
The plan here is to forgive all the student loans, give all the kiddies benefits and then ship them all back into grad school. Will keep the Liberal Academics fat and happy and keep Obama’s unemployment numbers from zooming off the charts.
That’s they way it’s done in Europe anyhow.
And who's supposed to insure the grandkids? If the kid is a minor (or adult up to 26) with a baby - who insures the baby? How does this work?
This makes sense. The 20-26 age group is one of the cheapest to insure by benefits paid out. They need to collect premiums from this group to fund more expensive parts of the program, such as seniors or those receiving subsidized insurance. This was the purpose of the mandate after all.