The Osama bin Laden Myth

Institute for Political Economy ^ | November 26, 2012 | The Osama bin Laden Myth

[Huskerfan44]

The interview below with Osama bin Laden was conducted by the Karachi, Pakistan, daily newspaper, Ummat and published on September 28, 2001, 17 days after the alleged, but unsubstantiated, al Qaeda attack of September 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center twin towers and Pentagon. The interview was sensational. The alleged “mastermind” of 9/11 said that he and al Qaeda had nothing to do with the 9/11 attack. The British Broadcasting Corporation’s World Monitoring Service had the interview translated into English and made public on September 29, 2001.

Osama bin Laden’s sensational denial was not reported by the US print and TV media. It was not investigated by the executive branch. No one in the US Congress called attention to bin Laden’s refusal of responsibility for the greatest humiliation ever inflicted on a superpower.

To check my memory of the lack of coverage, I googled “Osama bin Laden’s interview denying responsibility for 9/11.” Some Internet sites reproduced the interview, but the only mainstream news source that I found was a 1 minute YouTube video from CNN in which the anchor, after quoting an al Jazeera report of bin Laden’s denial, concludes that “we can all weigh that in the scale of credibility and come to our own conclusions.” In other words, bin Laden had already been demonized, and his denial was not credible.

The sensational news was unfit for US citizens and was withheld from them by the american “free press,” a press free to lie for the government but not to tell the truth.

[JoeProBono]

[IMR 4350]

To achieve your objective with a large scale terrorist attack you have to orchestrate the news before the attack then you have to follow up with the right spin of the news after the attack.

Whoever is spinning the news before and after the attack is the person with the objective.

The orchestrated news before the attack was “Bush stole the election”.

The spin of the news after the attack was “Bush Knew/Bush brought down the towers”.

IIRC it was sometime in 2005 that a UBL tape was released where UBL says the objective of the 9/11 attack was to bring down the president.

Considering the fact the Clintons had what was called a “20 year plan” (BC would serve as president for 8 years, 4 years of someone else as president, then Hillary would serve 8 years), the Clintons had to have a plan to make sure Gore didn't get elected and a plan to bring down the next president.

The Clintons are responsible for 9/11.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

lol, yea, ok

I see a disturbed person, you see some kind of genius.

Enjoy

[rodguy911]

Obviously, a man suffering from terminal lung and kidney disease did not survive for another decade to be murdered by a US Navy SEAL team in Abbottabad. A Pakistani TV interview with the neighbor of the alleged “bin Laden compound” exposed the assassination hoax. This sensational interview also went unreported by america’s “free press.” I had the interview translated, and it is available here:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/pakistan-tv-report-contradicts-us-claim-of-bin-laden-s-death/25915 See also http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13329078

........................

This too is like Benghazi. The more you get into it the more corners and avenues there seem to be. Truth is never just around the corner.