Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
perogie wasn't appealing to a real middle ~ he was appealing to factions in whole or in part already well ensconsed inside the Democrat and Republican parties.

He touched some nerves and got some votes. The electoral vote system more or less ignored him...

Okay. You've got political experience that I lack, and your take does ring true. Coalition-building, pasting together several factions, is where it's at.

It just occurred to me: if I were Liberal Larry, and I liked what I saw in Perot, I'd see his protectionism as a new and better way to punish big corporations with higher taxes. (A tariff is a tax.)

Needless to say, Liberal Larry's moral universe begins and ends with supporting those deemed "disadvantaged" or "victims." Any other appeal to morals browns Larry right off.

68 posted on 12/08/2012 7:32:39 PM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: danielmryan

on the other hand liberal larry’s ne’r do well brother in law would see in perogie a guy who created jobs and is concerned ~ so even though the two agree on everything, the BIL would vote or perogie and liberal larry might vote for Bush ~ imagining Clinton to be a clown.


70 posted on 12/08/2012 7:41:37 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson