If your personal observations include defending the homosexual agenda (or any other liberal/socialist/Marxist cause), then you may find your welcome here running out, just as many other atheists and liberaltarians have.
‘I think the turn-arounds seem fast because to most Americans, these two issues arent that important.’
How does the above statement defend the homosexual agenda?
If your personal observations include defending the homosexual agenda (or any other liberal/socialist/Marxist cause), then you may find your welcome here running out, just as many other atheists and liberaltarians have. |
Now, we're getting somewhere. Jim, I'm sure you've noticed my tagline over the years. I've taken tons of grief over it from libs who argue for legalized dope. Yet, we see silence from these same liberals when it comes to other libertarian agendas like pro-abortion and pro-gay marriages. Why is that?
lolol
I think we all know the answer is that these clowns would be zotted in a heartbeat if they progress from pro-dope to pro-abortions.
Yet the Libertarian agenda is advancing. Even here at FR. I'm sure you saw that Glenn Beck thread from yesterday where Beck endorsed gay marriages. And how many FReepers approved Beck's message? It was sickening to see that. Here at Free Republic.
I wish to God you would take a stand and zot the pro-dope libertarians here at FR. But you (to date) have not. Just understand that these libs are cagey. They get away with their pro-dope agenda, but remain quiet (for now) on their pro-abortion and pro-gay marraige issues because they know they will get the zot.