So it was either:
1. He killed her and stole her guns (illegal)
2. Mom did a straw purchase for son (illegal)
Yet if we banned guns, the crazy couldn’t have obtained the gun or just used a bat, bomb, bow, or anything else to do his evil.
Or he could have used his older brother’s ID (which he apparently had) and bought the guns himself. Yes?
“Or he could have used his older brother’s ID (which he apparently had) and bought the guns himself. Yes?”
No.
1. They are reporting the guns were registered to mom
2. The brother is a resident of NJ, not CT. This would have been caught during the NICS check with the FFL holder and the Feds.
In CT you need a pistol permit to purchase a hand gun IIRC. His brother lived in NJ and presumably didn’t have a CT Permit.