Only problem is many schools don't allow backpacks these days. If they are allowed, usually students are made to immediately store them in lockers until the end of the day.
1 posted on
12/19/2012 12:57:29 PM PST by
bgill
To: bgill
Nice thought but I don’t think it will stop a .223
2 posted on
12/19/2012 1:06:39 PM PST by
newbolt
To: bgill
And when a madman is putting between four and eleven rounds into each child...
A lightweight body armor backpack is useless.
But hey... If it makes a parent feel safer as they send little Billy off to indoctrination camp... er, ah, I mean elementary school, then fine.
3 posted on
12/19/2012 1:08:23 PM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: bgill
--
Only problem is many schools don't allow backpacks these days. --
And then there are the disarmament-advocating liberals who assert that there is no need for ANYBODY to own body armor.
4 posted on
12/19/2012 1:13:24 PM PST by
Cboldt
To: bgill
My child would never be shot in the back.
To: bgill
Bullet proof kiddy back packs is the stupidest thing I have ever heard of.
6 posted on
12/19/2012 1:35:58 PM PST by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: bgill
As an aside, my former Nazi pig congressman, Bart Stupak, introduced legislation to ban Americans from buying border armor.
10 posted on
12/19/2012 5:26:38 PM PST by
sergeantdave
(The FBI has declared war on the Marine Corps)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson