(Prince)Harry kills Taliban chief

SunUK ^ | 12/23/12 | Staff

[maine-iac7]

you opine: “Prince Harry is the only man capable of saving Great Britain. Not those fops William and Charles.”

Well, let’s see. Price Wills, as heir apparant, is not allowed in the combat zone - however, that has not kept him from danger...He, too, has had the guts and the brains to get into life threatening situations on an almost daily basis.

I wouldn’t call this man a ‘fop’...unless, of course, I was less than half the man and harbored - festered - jealousy as I sat back keeping my own arse snug and safe.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-william-in-dramatic-rescue-48-264007

and

http://perezhilton.com/2011-11-28-prince-william-rescues-two-russian-sailors-and-is-thanked-by-russia

for just two of many examples.

[maine-iac7]

I'll raise ya one - you post photos to prove your uneducated, unproven claim -

Well, there's also a great resemblance to THIS man - Earl of Spencer - you know, hsi UNCLE, Dianna's brother. It's calle FAMILY resemblance.

oh, that above is also the Earl - rather looks like Harry, eh wot?

But maybe you have more proof than just malicious gossip?

an aside: as a genealogist, I have noticed that children often resemble an aunt of uncle even more than a parent.

[maine-iac7]

Charles Edward Spencer, as a young an - Harry's uncle

oh yes, remember he also has the red hair, ruddy complection

[maine-iac7]

more of uncle Charles

below - Uncle Charles as a young father

red hair and ruddy complexion - ahahaha is an ancestral trait

So I posture that one could make the case foe Harry being a true blue -

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

It comes from Britain most notably. It is a very old ceremonial gesture in which the master of the hunt or huntsman would smear the blood of the fox or other kill onto the cheeks or forehead of a newly initiated hunt follower, often a young child.

It has its roots in other cultures including native American tribes.

[EEGator]

Thanks, I had never heard of that.

[miss marmelstein]

Richard the Third was English not British. He died leading his men on the field at Bosworth.

[miss marmelstein]

The Royal family have always had “gingers.” I believe Henry the 8th was a ginger and the remains of Anne Mowbray (married to Richard of York, Edward the 4th’s son), show vibrant red hair. Of course, she left no issue.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

That is correct, and Richard III might then be called the last English king, except he was king of both England and Wales. George II was German, but ruled Britain, and likewise, the current owners of the British crown, the Windsors of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, are also German. Sort of.

But then again, one could also say that the Plantagenets, including Richard III, were French, of the house of the Angevin Counts of Anjou.

[miss marmelstein]

Yes, certainly the Plantagenets had strong ties to France by blood. Plantagenet is a French name (it means “broom”). Richard the Third spoke fluent French.

[Candor7]

Harry was born in 1984; Hewitt began his affair with Diana in 1986.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

How can that possibly be verified? LOL. Every time line released on Diana is nothing but propaganda. Diana ‘s relationship with Hewitt in all likelihood, started much earlier than has been “officially” recognized.

I am glad Hewitt’s son has been officially recognized as a royal Harry, it is the best for all that this was accomplished pursuant to the leadership of Her Majesty.And the cuckhold will never achieve kingship, even for a moment, for one that cannot rule one’s spouse cannot rule a Kingdom.

[CatherineofAragon]

"How can that possibly be verified? LOL. Every time line released on Diana is nothing but propaganda."

I doubt if it will ever be scientifically verified, short of Harry showing up on Maury Povich for a paternity test, but Diana (of whom I am not a fan) did an interview in which she stated that's when the affair began; Hewitt himself said it began then; and a couple of Diana's close attendants say the same.

"Diana ‘s relationship with Hewitt in all likelihood, started much earlier than has been “officially” recognized."

LOL, "in all likelihood"? How do you verify THAT? Were you there?

"I am glad Hewitt’s son has been officially recognized as a royal Harry, it is the best for all that this was accomplished pursuant to the leadership of Her Majesty.And the cuckhold will never achieve kingship, even for a moment, for one that cannot rule one’s spouse cannot rule a Kingdom"

I don't know who the cuckold is...Charles? He'll rule at some point, unless he dies before Elizabeth. She is said to be firm on maintaining tradition and passing the crown to the next in line.

As for Harry, that's just the thing,isn't it? He isn't Hewitt's son. Nothing points to it. Not even his looks, since, as previously stated, there are quite a few on his Spencer side of the family who might be said to resemble Hewitt, as well. In fact, what we know points away from Hewitt and TO Charles. But apparently you are dead set on believing otherwise, and worse, on repeating the baseless slander that the guy, who is serving his country and just killed a Muslim savage, is a bastard. So I'll leave you to your fun.

[Candor7]

baseless slander >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Hey, as an American I have the traditional right to slander
British Royalty , a right created in 1776 when the Delaration of Independence was presented to George III.

Its common knowledge that Harry is Hewitt’s son. And those who believe in the royal mandate of heaven always disagree.

And I am happy that HRH recognized Harry as legitimate. You are the one, not I , who keeps using the term bastard in relation to Harry.

Charles royal arse will never warm the throne even for a second. He will be passed over.

[Oztrich Boy]

Harry does not match James Hewitt in shape of chin, mouth, nose, eyes, eyebrows, or ears.

Apart from the Spencer hair, in those details he does match this guy

Midshipman Phillip Mountbatten c.1940, his paternal grandfather.

[CatherineofAragon]

Wow, the resemblance is striking.

Thank you.