Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

Your observation about the lack of CSA sea power would certainly not be overlooked by Confederate leaders as this was the reason they would have nearly lost the war. The development of the Confederate navy would have been task number one beginning in 1864. I seriously doubt the Democratic leaders in the north would have gone back to war to save Cuba in 1866.


31 posted on 01/04/2013 5:11:31 PM PST by Tail Gunner John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Tail Gunner John

Building a Navy capable of challenging the Royal Navy would have been quite a project, in all likelihood well beyond the capabilities of the CSA.

Anywho, I thought the South seceded because of the oppressive federal taxes. Do you have any idea how much building a major navy cost at the time, or now for that matter? It would also require the development of a truly massive industrial infrastructure, something the South was ideologically opposed to, and which could not have come into existence without large protective tariffs, something specifically prohibited by the CSA Constitution.

Essentially, the CSA could be a low-tax limited government backwater or (theoretically but unlikely given its low population) a hemisphere-conquering industrial and military behemoth.

It could not be both.


32 posted on 01/04/2013 5:21:43 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson