Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonx6
Speaking as one who was for many years involved in the ownership, leasing, and management of a downtown Charlotte office building and attached parking garage, I have no problem whatever with the city eliminating the minimum parking requirement. Let the market decide. Parking, in and of itself, is a monetary loser, but it is necessary to have adequate parking in order to lease office space.

The building with which I was associated had far more than minimum required by city code, and the "excess" parking served us well as a "loss leader"; the building remained fully leased, or nearly so.

Now, if Austin were to institute a maximum parking space limit for every private office or residential building, then you'd have a major problem, especially in that the city is already competing with private parking providers in the form of metered on-street parking, municipal (taxpayer-funded, in other words) parking decks and lots, and mass transit.

One more problem for owners/operators of private real estate: hefty taxes, over and above property taxes, imposed on parking. Make parking expensive by creating artificial shortages and high taxes, and that spiffy new light rail or streetcar line starts to look more attractive.

29 posted on 01/09/2013 4:20:14 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina ("Better be wise by the misfortunes of others than by your own." -- Aesop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: southernnorthcarolina
Figures, they build a rail that nobody uses and now they must corner people
into considering the option.
54 posted on 01/10/2013 6:23:46 AM PST by MaxMax (Gun free zones was the invitation to gun bans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson