>>Dick Morris is full of crap, just as I said. Heck, the guy just predicted Romney would win comfortably. In 2010 he was predicting the Republicans would win upward of 70-80+ (he was actually talking about upward of 100) House seats and 10 Senate seats, we didn’t come anywhere close that.<<
And now you’re a liar just like your pal Obama.
“Asked if he is predicting that Republicans will win 100 seats in the House, Morris tells Newsmax: “I’m not predicting 100, I’m predicting 60 to 80. But I fantasize 100, and I think that fantasy may come true.”
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/dick-morris-midterm-elections/2010/10/29/id/375353
You: “Yes, it will be a good night for Republicans, but nothing even close to what Morris is predicting.”
Hey dumb f, 63 is between 60 and 80.
It wasn’t a “good night”, the House turnover was historic azzhat. Besides, why would you trying raining on his parade on a conservative blog dumbazz? (hint... you’re a lib.) Oh.. but “Obama’s approval ratings alone are too high (RCP average 46.3)” Right, you worship Obama.
“Umm, I don’t believe Santorum is electable and I wish Newt had stayed in. So? What of it?”
Then just leave it at that azzhat. But you couldn’t could you? Had to throw it this... “we would be stuck with Rick enlightening us on the evils of birth control, gambling, etc. Once people realize Santorum is doubling as a priest running for President most of them will run as far away from him as possible.“ Why would you say “doubling as a priest”? What good does that do around here. (hint... you’re an atheist.)
I’m right. You always knew I was right and now so does everyone else.
You're a conspiracy nut. Period. You're someone who backs Alex Jones, the same Alex Jones that is largely banned right here on FR. The same truther Alex Jones who believes 9-11 is a government plot. That you believe that sick stuff blares loudly to everyone that you aren't too bright.
The stuff you are cutting and pasting from my past posts simply shows that I was right. The 2010 election wasn't just about House seats you dimwit, there were also a lot of Senate seats up for grabs and Morris predicted we'd win 10 and take the Senate.
Hey dumb f, 63 is between 60 and 80.
Listen, I don't know if your brain is this addled because of all the goofy conspiracies you buy into, but the 2010 election came out about how most analysts figured. The consensus was generally mid 50's for House seats and about 6-7 Senate seats. We won a few more House seats than most predicted, and equal or just a little less on the Senate side. Morris was wrong. He was predicting far more. You pull one quote from Newsmax where idiot Dick Morris says he thinks his fantasy of 100 may come true, but he was pointing to the possibility of 100 on Fox many times. Do you not know what a buffoon Morris is? Or that his predictions tend to be horribly wrong? I mean, come one, this is the guy who wrote that ridiculous Condi versus Hillary book.
Then just leave it at that azzhat
Why? I can leave it anything I want you conspiracy loon. I don't think Santorum can win a national general election. Nor do I want a nominee telling us why he believes contraception is "not okay". We are electing a president, not a priest. I look to the church for spiritual guidance, not elected officials.
Dude not only are you a nitwit who spouts Sandy Hook conspiracies and actually believes the drivel Alex Jones spews, you are not good at this debate stuff. At least if you're going to go digging back through posts that are years and years old, find something I was actually wrong about.