Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IbJensen

This probably isn’t going to be popular, but remember that the IRS doesn’t make the rules, they enforce them.

This is apparently an evolving situation (make it up as they go along) such that as they see how various affected groups react, the noose gets tightened. The best hope, imho, is with the states, but I don’t know how much good that will do wrt the Treasury Dept. Does anyone doubt that 0bama is trying to force people out of business via Cloward-Piven?
I wouldn’t be surprised if paying the penalty instead of buying a policy isn’t eliminated or raised before it’s time.
We need to somehow treat this the same way we will treat the 2A. It *will* crash the economy because it will destroy so many vulnerable people, financially.


14 posted on 01/13/2013 5:43:43 AM PST by KGeorge (hoplophobia: n. irrational, morbid fear of guns. A mental disorder coined by Col. Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KGeorge
This probably isn’t going to be popular, but remember that the IRS doesn’t make the rules, they enforce them.

The IRS does make the rules. The Congress makes the laws. If Congress passed a law requiring employees to no fire employees or reduce there hours then there wouldn't be a loophole.

Laws = Congress / Rules = faceless bureaucrat dictators.

18 posted on 01/13/2013 5:53:33 AM PST by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: KGeorge
This probably isn’t going to be popular, but remember that the IRS doesn’t make the rules, they enforce them.

Wrong. The IRS made up the rule about the number of temp employees being equal to a number of full time employees based on the total hours worked by all. Made it up out of whole cloth.

That's only one example.

36 posted on 01/13/2013 6:39:37 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: KGeorge
I wouldn’t be surprised if paying the penalty instead of buying a policy isn’t eliminated or raised before it’s time.

Along with the "50 or more" rule they are already weakening.

It won't be long before every family has add at least one indigent Obama voter to their own personal health plan, in the interest of "fundamental fairness." :)

Growing businesses making the transition from small to medium-sized are a huge headaches for Communist revolutionaries. They give the proletariat subversive ideas about personal success and threaten the profits of the Revolution's large corporatist backers. They must be destroyed.

49 posted on 01/13/2013 7:56:58 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: KGeorge
I wouldn’t be surprised if paying the penalty instead of buying a policy isn’t eliminated or raised before it’s time.

Along with the "50 or more" rule they are already weakening.

It won't be long before every family has add at least one indigent Obama voter to their own personal health plan, in the interest of "fundamental fairness." :)

Growing businesses making the transition from small to medium-sized are a huge headaches for Communist revolutionaries. They give the proletariat subversive ideas about personal success and threaten the profits of the Revolution's large corporatist backers. They must be destroyed.

50 posted on 01/13/2013 7:56:58 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson