No,bad comparison...although many here do it.Below is an image that's much more appropriate on many different levels.
Posted on 01/15/2013 7:17:52 PM PST by paltz
Sorry, correction... after this thread was posted.
Yep, 2 defense shots for the public. But the cops will then fire 156 rounds at a single unarmed suspect who reaches for a cell phone. But that’s OK. They are cops.
Or maybe 41 shots at an unarmed guy in a dark doorway. That’s OK too. They are cops. Lots of shots.
But Joe Public, we get 2 shots in self defense.
I don’t recognize my nation anymore.
A big-assed harpoon might bring down a big-dumbassed Nadler but then, again, it might not. A 5” naval gun might do the job on “Moby Nadler”.
This guy is such a fool that even the reds have distanced themselves from him. Once was connected to the “Rev” Al Sharpton and the crazy marxist Leonore Fulani and her movement.
If there was ever a crazy uncle in the closet, it would be Nader, but as Roy Schneider said in the movie “Jaws”, ‘you’re gonna need a bigger closet”.
Not only that but what about the jihadist and radical muslims who want to take over America and kill all infidels? They will surely have more guns and ammo than the average citizen. And as an aside, are we to waste our limited ammo on saving liberals who want guns banned? Got to pray a lot on that one. (wink)
That’s why they want to restrict our arms. And, they know a tyrannical government when they see one, just like we do.
Me too!
Good for you. Love the Pink. I think I told you I got a pink thermos to keep Hubby from running off with it and losing it. It is the only thermos I have ever been able to keep. All the others just wandered off with him and never came back.
Nadler wants you to have bean bag rounds and/or spitwads.
“Hunters don’t use large ammunition clips”
ARGH. Another idiot who doesn’t know the difference between a clip and a magazine. ARGH.
“If you’re defending yourself against a robber…if you have a pistol permit...two or three or four shots should be enough—period.”
Spoken like someone who has never handled or fired a handgun in his life. It ain’t like the movies, Jerry baby. The good guys don’t always hit with the first shot, and the bad guys don’t always go down right away. Especially if they don’t get hit in center of mass the first time or two.
Nadler can go FIRST. Let him give his security guards bean bags and spit wads. He certainly has lots of spit to recycle.
His comment regarding no more than 4 shots is just brain dead stupid and just proves that his grip on reality is insufficient, and qualifies him for the loony bin-not Congress.
The New YOrk City record for a perp survivng with hits from service pistols is:
21 rounds. The guy survived.
I would feel much safer IF I had a large drone with 2-4 hellfire missiles for the truly dangerous usurpers of my God given rights. FAT CHANCE! eh Nadler?
It would probably take an elephant gun to take that fat ass down.
If each thug, g-man or dog killer would carry a gun with only 2 or 4 shots, I’ll be happy with one that holds 20 or 40 shots. I might be a little nervous so I want at least a 10 point advantage. Then add another 10 for each additional thug.
And if he was specifically asked if citizens can use firearms for self defense he would equivocate, knowing full well his sociopathic base full of weirdos, kooks and not least of all anti-white racists loath the notion of people being able to defend themselves.
No,bad comparison...although many here do it.Below is an image that's much more appropriate on many different levels.
Nadler has never looked that masculine in his entire life.
“The only people who should ever be firing large clips of ammunition is the military.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Of course this makes sense to Nadler because he envisions a time to come soon when the military will be tasked to eliminate millions of “useless eaters”. Naturally fatass does not expect to be one of those useless eaters even though he very obviously is the definition of useless eater.
Dear Rep. Nadler:
With all due respect to the position that you hold, I, not YOU, will decide how, what and with what I will defend myself, my family and my property, sir. You’re entitled to your opinion, but we are not your subjects. We are citizens and have a God-given and Constitutional right to defend ourselves as we see fit. With that said, why don’t you go find another pastrami sandwich somewhere and leave such important issues to real men.
Sorry for the confusion. I meant not “just” about personal self-defense. I type too fast for my brain to keep up, and I type really, really slow..........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.