Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Nadler: Two to Four Self-Defense Shots is Enough
Breitbart News ^ | 1/15/13 | Kerry Picket

Posted on 01/15/2013 7:17:52 PM PST by paltz

Nadler told Breitbart News:

Hunters don’t use large ammunition clips, and as far as self defense, I mean who are you defending yourself against? If you’re defending yourself against a robber…if you have a pistol permit or you’re carrying a gun because you work for Wells Fargo and you’re taking money in and out of a bank or something, two or three or four shots should be enough—period.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; democrats; guncontrol; idiot; ihateliberalidiots; secondamendment; stinkingliberalidiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last
To: Marcella

Sorry, correction... after this thread was posted.


101 posted on 01/15/2013 11:16:22 PM PST by Bikkuri (Hope for Conservative push in the next 2-4 years..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Yep, 2 defense shots for the public. But the cops will then fire 156 rounds at a single unarmed suspect who reaches for a cell phone. But that’s OK. They are cops.

Or maybe 41 shots at an unarmed guy in a dark doorway. That’s OK too. They are cops. Lots of shots.

But Joe Public, we get 2 shots in self defense.

I don’t recognize my nation anymore.


102 posted on 01/16/2013 12:04:33 AM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Free goodies for all -- Freedom for none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYRepublican72

A big-assed harpoon might bring down a big-dumbassed Nadler but then, again, it might not. A 5” naval gun might do the job on “Moby Nadler”.

This guy is such a fool that even the reds have distanced themselves from him. Once was connected to the “Rev” Al Sharpton and the crazy marxist Leonore Fulani and her movement.

If there was ever a crazy uncle in the closet, it would be Nader, but as Roy Schneider said in the movie “Jaws”, ‘you’re gonna need a bigger closet”.


103 posted on 01/16/2013 12:50:03 AM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: C210N
It’s self defense against a Tyrannical government; two to four is meaningless.

Not only that but what about the jihadist and radical muslims who want to take over America and kill all infidels? They will surely have more guns and ammo than the average citizen. And as an aside, are we to waste our limited ammo on saving liberals who want guns banned? Got to pray a lot on that one. (wink)

104 posted on 01/16/2013 4:01:00 AM PST by beachn4fun (Wanted: thread volunteers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C210N

That’s why they want to restrict our arms. And, they know a tyrannical government when they see one, just like we do.


105 posted on 01/16/2013 4:30:49 AM PST by Quickgun (I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

Me too!


106 posted on 01/16/2013 5:36:05 AM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

Good for you. Love the Pink. I think I told you I got a pink thermos to keep Hubby from running off with it and losing it. It is the only thermos I have ever been able to keep. All the others just wandered off with him and never came back.


107 posted on 01/16/2013 5:38:37 AM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

Nadler wants you to have bean bag rounds and/or spitwads.


108 posted on 01/16/2013 5:42:30 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: paltz

“Hunters don’t use large ammunition clips”

ARGH. Another idiot who doesn’t know the difference between a clip and a magazine. ARGH.

“If you’re defending yourself against a robber…if you have a pistol permit...two or three or four shots should be enough—period.”

Spoken like someone who has never handled or fired a handgun in his life. It ain’t like the movies, Jerry baby. The good guys don’t always hit with the first shot, and the bad guys don’t always go down right away. Especially if they don’t get hit in center of mass the first time or two.


109 posted on 01/16/2013 6:09:22 AM PST by DemforBush (You might very well think that. I could not *possibly* comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Nadler can go FIRST. Let him give his security guards bean bags and spit wads. He certainly has lots of spit to recycle.

His comment regarding no more than 4 shots is just brain dead stupid and just proves that his grip on reality is insufficient, and qualifies him for the loony bin-not Congress.


110 posted on 01/16/2013 6:21:47 AM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: paltz

The New YOrk City record for a perp survivng with hits from service pistols is:

21 rounds. The guy survived.


111 posted on 01/16/2013 6:38:23 AM PST by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

I would feel much safer IF I had a large drone with 2-4 hellfire missiles for the truly dangerous usurpers of my God given rights. FAT CHANCE! eh Nadler?


112 posted on 01/16/2013 6:41:29 AM PST by Movemout ( all it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to look away and do nothing-FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: paltz

It would probably take an elephant gun to take that fat ass down.

If each thug, g-man or dog killer would carry a gun with only 2 or 4 shots, I’ll be happy with one that holds 20 or 40 shots. I might be a little nervous so I want at least a 10 point advantage. Then add another 10 for each additional thug.


113 posted on 01/16/2013 7:35:43 AM PST by Terry Mross (People who hate me read my posts and get angry. Yet they can't look away. hee hee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

And if he was specifically asked if citizens can use firearms for self defense he would equivocate, knowing full well his sociopathic base full of weirdos, kooks and not least of all anti-white racists loath the notion of people being able to defend themselves.


114 posted on 01/16/2013 7:42:46 AM PST by junta ("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Has Nadler ever served in the Armed Forces? No,I didn't think so.Has Nadler ever served as a police officer? No,I didn't think so.Given these facts all I'd say to Comrade Nadler is “have another Pop Tart,you worthless tub of lard”!
115 posted on 01/16/2013 8:09:21 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (When Robbing Peter To Pay Paul,One Can Always Count On Paul's Cooperation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)

No,bad comparison...although many here do it.Below is an image that's much more appropriate on many different levels.


116 posted on 01/16/2013 8:15:37 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (When Robbing Peter To Pay Paul,One Can Always Count On Paul's Cooperation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Nadler has never looked that masculine in his entire life.


117 posted on 01/16/2013 8:58:57 AM PST by RipSawyer (I was born on Earth, what planet is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing

“The only people who should ever be firing large clips of ammunition is the military.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Of course this makes sense to Nadler because he envisions a time to come soon when the military will be tasked to eliminate millions of “useless eaters”. Naturally fatass does not expect to be one of those useless eaters even though he very obviously is the definition of useless eater.


118 posted on 01/16/2013 9:16:00 AM PST by RipSawyer (I was born on Earth, what planet is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Dear Rep. Nadler:
With all due respect to the position that you hold, I, not YOU, will decide how, what and with what I will defend myself, my family and my property, sir. You’re entitled to your opinion, but we are not your subjects. We are citizens and have a God-given and Constitutional right to defend ourselves as we see fit. With that said, why don’t you go find another pastrami sandwich somewhere and leave such important issues to real men.


119 posted on 01/16/2013 9:22:25 AM PST by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Sorry for the confusion. I meant not “just” about personal self-defense. I type too fast for my brain to keep up, and I type really, really slow..........


120 posted on 01/16/2013 12:11:58 PM PST by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson