[Boogieman]

“But it means that this is a heavily filtered event, and there is no way to be sure about any of it.”

I don’t think anyone argues that the left and the media aren’t trying to use this event to push their agenda, but the conspiracy theories are simply ludicrous. Also, for every point they make, I can draw an exact parallel to some “inconsistencies” in the early Columbine coverage. Yet we do know the details about Columbine now, and none of the “unanswered questions” about that event have held up over the course of time.

[ClearCase_guy]

Do you know if Emilie Parker is alive or dead? I sure don't. They say she was killed in the shooting. But she appeared with Obama when he visited the town after the shooting.

I don't really find Sandy Hook interesting. Small number of dead children. Thousands more dead children every day through abortion -- that is much more significant. Sandy Hook serves to help the gun grabbers, and I would prefer that Sandy Hook either not be talked about, or else be ridiculed as a complete media farce.

[RummyChick]

Think about this. Obama is craving to ban weapons. What happened after Columbine? We saw this:


Where are the pictures of Lanza with his gun?