My position:
It is ABUSIVE to place one’s child in a school where she is in danger of being raped.
My comment had absolutely nothing to do with citizens **voluntarily** seeking work with an employer who uses identification tags.
And...There is a big difference between **willingly** seeking work with an employer and being under police threat to attend a prison-like school where one is likely to be RAPED!
If an adult would object to being under police threat to be FORCED into an institution where they are likely to be RAPED, why do we think this would be good for children? Huh?
Finally....There are some government schools in this nation that are, indeed, soooooo horrific that it would be better for the child to **never** attend. Illiteracy and innumeracy can be fixed. Dead and/or raped can't be.
Big difference!
Where was any of what I posted a “strawman”? And for those of you in Rio Linda, it is spelled “cannot”, not “can not”. If this, along with your numerous other misspelling and grammatical errors in your posts is an example of your acumen as a “teacher”, I have some serious doubts as to the quality of the education you are providing to your children. Sorry, just saying…
It is ABUSIVE to place one’s child in a school where she is in danger of being raped.
Where did I mention anything about being raped? I think you are referring to another poster who talked about that and not me. Talk about a “strawman”.
But while you are on the topic of rape or RAPE, answer me this; does homeschooling inoculate your daughter from the possibility of ever being raped? Will she never leave your house, never go out in public, will she never get a job outside your home? Does homeschooling alone forever protect her from such very real vileness in the very real world?
And...There is a big difference between **willingly** seeking work with an employer and being under police threat to attend a prison-like school where one is likely to be RAPED!
If an adult would object to being under police threat to be FORCED into an institution where they are likely to be RAPED, why do we think this would be good for children? Huh?
Finally....There are some government schools in this nation that are, indeed, soooooo horrific that it would be better for the child to **never** attend. Illiteracy and innumeracy can be fixed. Dead and/or raped can't be.
You are completely delusional and paranoid to an extreme if you think that every student in every public school across the entire nation is “likely” to be raped or killed. Does it happen in some schools, mostly inner city schools, yes, and that is completely unacceptable no matter where that happens, yes, but you seem to be against that very technology which would make such less likely to happen.
Big difference!
Yea. Right. Whatever. Again, my post was not a defense of public schools, was not a post claiming that ID cards with or without RFID chips would protect against rape, something you seem to have fixated on for some strange reason, nor was my post in opposition to private or homeschooling, something I said I supported. Go back and re-read my post again and get back to me when you are a little less hysterical and have obtained a better level of reading comprehension. My question BTW, wasn’t about safety or protection from rape per se, but whether the use if ID cards with or without RFID chips in schools or in the work place goes against your religious beliefs, if they all represent the “mark of the beast” in your opinion and your understanding of 1st amendment rights and whether nor not such ID cards have legitimate uses in schools and in the workplace per the examples I provided in my previous post.