Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: varmintman
it would involve biometrics and p2p networking and the idea that ANYBODY could do his own vote tally and that all tallies should match. It also should involve the idea that a person could have total assurance that his vote did not disappear or get counted for the other guy.

EXACTLY, and I've been thinking this for a while. Senator FineSwine can propose a database to track gun owners (you might as well propose a database to track unicorns for all the good it will do), but we can't do something on a national level to track voting.

It should be based on a finger print or prints, be in a single database, and be accessible by BOTH parties, in a READ ONLY mode. The fingerprint takes the Voter ID off the table, since Democrats can't whine that the poor can't afford a finger print ID. It would allow for same day registration WITH proper Identification, and the vote could be tagged for review so that it's not fraudulent or cast twice.

If a voter attempts to vote twice, it would immediately show up on the system, and should be flagged. The fraudulent voter would be taken into immediate custody, and there need to be HEAVY Federal penalties for voting twice (we could sell that by "admitting" that we cheated just a little bit in a minor election in the past, and want to atone for it - what could the Dems say to that?). That penalty should include permanently losing your right to vote.

There's more, but I'm short on time. This is an idea that is way past due for execution.

19 posted on 01/25/2013 4:50:16 AM PST by Hardastarboard (The Liberal ruling class hates me. The feeling is mutual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Hardastarboard

The main ideas are that my vote stays on my computer or some computer I have access to so that I can ascertain that it didn’t just fall into some bit bucket, and ANYBODY can do tallies the same way you go out over BitTorrent or Kwazaa looking for a copy of “You aint nothin but a hound dog”, i.e. issue a p2p call, and all tallies should produce the same number. Votes in response to the call would have to include a thumbprint scan which should match a national database and anybody doing a tally could also use statistical checks on validity.


26 posted on 01/25/2013 7:52:21 AM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson