Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
-- There is one other option. The House can refuse to fund the NLRB. --

There are many options. Individual litigants can ignore NLRB rulings; and, following the administration's lead, might as well feel free to ignore court rulings as well.

-- But this really is getting serious now. --

I enjoy a meaty constitutional crisis.

That said, I don't see much harm in the NLRB acting as though this decision will be reversed. If the case was heard in a different Circuit, the result would have been different - so, looking forward, current cases may end up with appellate courts holding that the appointments were constitutional.

Fascinating that there really isn't a rule of law, and that the constitution means whatever the most powerful bully says it means. SCOTUS, the ultimate bully, will speak up in due course.

26 posted on 01/25/2013 2:49:13 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

“That said, I don’t see much harm in the NLRB acting as though this decision will be reversed.”

One private dollar wasted in the process is enough harm for me.


90 posted on 01/25/2013 10:41:05 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Thought Puzzle: Describe Islam without using the phrase "mental disorder" more than four times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson